Seo Indexer alternative: a field guide to the link pusher with two names

The first identification problem is the animal's own name. The headline on the homepage says “Seo Indexer”, the testimonials say “SeoIndexer”, and the logo, the page title and the Terms and About pages say “Link Processor”. The logo is an orange and black “LINK PROCESSOR” wordmark with a chip icon. Treat these as one service wearing two nametags: the domain is seoindexer.net, the company text calls itself Link Processor, and a second contact address on the homepage uses seoindexer.co.

Other marks, in order of how easy they are to spot: a large green GET STARTED NOW button, a diagram of boxes labelled Backlink #1 to Backlink #8 with arrows pointing at one browser window, a San Diego phone number and street address, and the orange line “Better Features | Better Pricing | Better Results”. The overall look is a classic landing page. The footer says © 2018, which is the only date on the site, so it is a copyright year and not a founding year.

What it is not: a link seller, a link builder or a data provider. It is a paid, automated service that takes backlink URLs you already have and processes them. That makes it a neighbour of ours rather than a rival, which is the whole point of this guide.

Seo Indexer lives at www.seoindexer.net; the bare domain answers with a redirect. The public navigation is short: Home, Packages, Reverse Proxies, Captcha Solutions, FAQ, About, Affiliates, Privacy, Terms, Contact, Login and Register. No API documentation is linked from the public pages.

The About page names Tyler Willson as CEO and founder and says he grew up in San Diego, began his entrepreneurial journey at 19 and took out a bank loan to buy a Postal Annex store. The footer carries a San Diego street address. The company claims “over 2,000+ companies have used Link Processor”; that is its own marketing line and we have no way to verify it.

The same domain hosts two neighbouring products. One is a pool of backconnect proxies (“700,000+”, sold by thread count), the other is a captcha-solving service sold by the hundred thousand solves. Both are priced from the same kind of monthly menu as the indexing plans. Together they make the site a small shop of bulk-submission tools, with link indexing as the first item on the menu.

Seo Indexer eats URLs. You submit a backlink, through a campaign or through the API and RPC ping, and the service pushes it through what the site calls “3 Circles Of Link Processing”: crawling, indexing and link pushing. A campaign can be drip-fed over “up to 30 days”. Resellers get public link reports, so an agency can show a client proof that links were submitted.

Appetite is measured in links per day, and that is the lever that sets the price. The listed plans are 5,000, 150,000 and 300,000 links a day, each with unlimited campaigns and unlimited API and RPC requests. A fourth card repeats the 150,000 tier on a six-month plan. There is no free tier or trial on the page, only a 30-day money-back line.

What it does not eat is data requests. The API is a way in, not a way out: you push links to it. It does not tell you who links to whom. Nothing on the public site describes an endpoint that returns backlink rows, and that gap is where a second tool starts to be useful.

Observed behaviour is more modest than the headline. The headline says “Instantly Rank Higher”. The FAQ is calmer, and we quote it because the difference is informative:

“Nobody can guarantee indexing as only search engines have full control of it.”

The same answer adds that the service guarantees link crawling and link pushing. That is a precise and sensible promise: it covers what the service does, not what a search engine decides. It also tells you how to read the product. You are buying activity on your links, and indexing is an outcome you have to measure afterwards.

The public pages do not say which search engines are targeted, how pushing to authority link filters works, how long a submission takes, or whether the public report shows actual index status or only submission status. All of that is not published. That is not an accusation, and plenty of services keep their mechanism private, but it means any claim about speed belongs to you and your own test batch, not to us or to the brochure.

All plans are USD subscriptions that you can cancel at any time. The cards show a struck-through “was” price next to a “NOW” price, under a banner that still mentioned April when we looked in October 2026. We use the NOW figures and date them: checked 2026-10-09, and likely to change.

Two things stand out. The jump from the first to the second tier is small in money and enormous in quota, so a user with a modest list pays almost the same as one with a huge list. And the per-1,000 figures only hold if you actually submit the full quota; a small agency sending a few thousand links a month is paying about $91 for the right to do so.

Our own meter is different in kind. A lookup on apibacklinks costs 1 credit, one credit is $0.0001, and the $100 starter credit on first sign-in with Google covers a million lookups. Those prices buy answers about links, not pushes of links, so the two bills are never really substitutes.

Field guides tell you to look for tracks. The equivalent here is to ask a crawl-based index whether your links are visible at all. A service that processes links can report that it submitted them; whether a crawler later sees them on the live page is a separate question, and it is the one that matters for the next step of the job.

That is the place for apibacklinks. Pull refdomains for the target, or backlinks with a date-range filter, and compare the list with what you submitted. Links that are submitted but absent from the data are candidates for a second look: the page may be gone, the link may be nofollow, or the crawl simply has not reached it yet. Our refresh is roughly monthly, not real-time, so a link placed last week will not show. For the indexing job itself, the sibling service in our network is IndexJump. For other tools in the same family, see the hub of indexer comparisons, or the page on Binstantindexer.

Honest limit: our web index is a broad sample, so a missing link is a prompt to investigate, never proof that a link does not exist.

Take a hypothetical case: someone has 40,000 backlinks and wants something to work on them every day. In that case apibacklinks is the wrong tool and Seo Indexer is a reasonable one. We do not submit, ping, crawl or push anything. We provide data.

• Bulk processing. Plans run from 5,000 to 300,000 links per day with unlimited campaigns. We do not process links at all.
• Drip feed. Campaigns can be scheduled over up to 30 days. We have no scheduling.
• Reseller proof. Public link reports exist so an agency can show clients what was submitted. We have no client-facing dashboards or shareable reports.
• Automation hooks. The API and RPC ping take links from other SEO tools. Our API reads; it never accepts links.

Who should stay: anyone whose job is the push, and who already measures the result some other way. Who should add us: anyone who wants to see, in rows and counts, what a crawl found.

You do not need a login to look at the subject. The free overview action returns the profile of any domain without a key, and the explorer shows the same report in a browser. For lists, the paid actions need a key; the API docs list all 19 actions.

1. Run overview on your own domain and note referring domains and DR.
2. Pull refdomains (up to 100 rows) and set it beside your submitted link list; check which donors show up.
3. Repeat after the next monthly refresh and compare. Keep the dates.

Our DR is our own metric, comparable in spirit to other tools' scores and not the same number. Use it for relative comparison inside one index.