A Write a Guest Post alternative, in the form of a letter to the person holding the order

You are about to email a Gmail address and ask for a Premium Article. Before you do, one small discrepancy. The browser tab says Write a Guest Post - Guest Posting Service - Guest Post Site. The footer says "© 2026 Reblog it". The Terms page, the WordPress site name and the social tags say Reblog it. The body copy switches between ReblogIt and ReBlogIt, and the logo is set as REBLOGit with the "it" in red. We treat it as one seller with several spellings, but I would ask the seller to confirm the trading name in writing before you pay.

The homepage headline, which fills the whole top of the screenshot, reads Guest Blogging – Write for Us – Collaboration Opportunities Through Guest Posting. It is a recruiting page for writers that also happens to be the product page for buyers. There is no cart, no account area and no price. The site says it responds within 72 hours, and every published post ends with an author box repeating the same email contact.

None of this is unusual for a small publisher. It does mean the terms of your order are whatever the email thread says they are, so this letter is about what to ask in it.

The homepage and the /write-for-us/ page describe the same offer a little differently. Read both before you brief a writer.

The Premium Article, described on the write-for-us page, comes with published within a maximum publish time of two working days, with up to five do-follow links, no word limit, a share to newsletter subscribers and social channels, and no in-content ads on request. The free tier gets one link and one image, and the author must add a link back to the published article from their own site "for making your do-follow link live permanently". The queue for free posts has no stated wait. On refunds the page says there is none if you cancel the order yourself.

Notice what is missing: a price, a currency, a payment method, any statement of how long a paid link stays live, and whether paid links carry rel="sponsored". The site calls them do-follow. We did not inspect individual published posts, so the attribute on a given placement is a thing to check, not a thing to assume.

The sidebar widget titled The Next Big Find links to the sister sites namasteui.com, writometer.com, entrepreneurhow.com and mylinkbook.com. The site's own article Top 10 Bloggers in India, dated November 12, 2024, puts Sourav Basak first and says his blogs "include Namaste UI, Reblogit, Entrepreneur How, and Writometer". Two independent write-ups, from SeekaHost in 2023 and World Authors in 2021, say the same. The About page does not name an owner, so I will say it the careful way: ownership is attributed to him by the site itself and by third parties, not stated on a contact page.

Now put that beside the crawl. namasteui.com sends 19,767 links from 7,274 pages, all dofollow, DR 34. Nearly all use one anchor: Submit Your Guest Post on Reblogit.com. mylinkbook.com sends 6,936 links from 4,165 pages, DR 12, with the anchor Order Now; that sister site shows a box headed "Buy DA 50+ backlinks now!" and the button points here. entrepreneurhow.com adds 499 links from 183 pages (Find here).

Add them up, together with the single link that writometer.com contributes, and you reach 27,203 of 28,912, or 94.1%. These are template links, the kind a footer or sidebar widget produces on every page of a site. They are a normal way to cross-promote a family of sites. They are also not 28,912 independent endorsements, and the headline count is better read as a measure of the family's reach than of outside endorsement. Outside that family and one other source, 95 domains in the top-100 list contribute 366 links.

The third-largest referrer in our index is twinspires.com, with 1,336 links. All of them are nofollow. They come from a single page on blog.twinspires.com, a 2013 article about the Kentucky Derby, and its comment-thread URL variants: 193 crawled versions of one comment, each carrying the same four anchors, nodejs, online marketing, food application ideas and artificial intelligence.

That one comment explains 88% of the domain's nofollow links (1,336 of 1,515) and, not by coincidence, the four inner posts that look most linked, at 339 to 349 backlinks each. If you read a raw backlink total or a top-pages list without grouping by referring domain, you would think those posts were popular. They carry those counts because of one old comment, not because readers linked to them. This is the cleanest argument I know for always asking for the per-domain view before reading any number about a seller's own authority.

The most recent thing in the profile is a cluster. Thirty referring domains were first seen between 2026-06-06 and 2026-09-09. All sit at DR 39 to 42, all are dofollow, and each gives one to five links, 64 in total. The anchors are service phrases: buy guest posts, dofollow backlink services, white-hat guest blogging solutions, affordable guest posting packages, paid guest blogging websites list, sponsored blog posting service. Examples include constico.com, build-mind.com, dominerbusiness.com, moz-news.com, whelex.com, toppinvestors.com and clinicalkeynote.com. The linking pages sit on subdomains such as building.constico.com and getsales.build-mind.com and point at the homepage or /write-for-us/.

In crawl data this is what an anchor-text campaign for the phrase "guest posting" looks like. Who ran it, the site owner, a vendor or someone else, the index cannot say. I am describing a pattern, not accusing anyone. For you the practical point is narrower: a seller's own backlink profile is a public record of how they promote themselves, and you can read it in a few minutes.

A few smaller curiosities for completeness: one Mongolian municipal subdomain links nofollow with link building company; the blogger's name appears as an anchor eight times, which fits the ownership attribution; and custom eyelash packaging points ten times at an article about truck trailers, which looks like an off-topic comment anchor.

If the placement you want is a readable article on a live editorial site, this seller has real strengths that apibacklinks does not even try to match.

• It is a real publication. 525 published posts, the newest dated 2026-09-30, a Google News publication link on the homepage, and a stated 50,000+ search impressions a month (its figure, undated, and impressions rather than visits).
• It is fast and human. A stated maximum of two working days for Premium, a stated 72-hour reply, and a person on the other end of the email.
• It has a free route. One link and one image, in exchange for a reciprocal link. For a first test of the channel that costs only your time.
• It does the work we do not. We do not build links, sell links or index pages. We provide data. If you need an article placed, a tool will not place it for you.

Stay with the seller if you are buying one or two placements, you do not need an account system, and a short email thread suits you. You do not need an API to buy a single post.

Here is the practical part. These are the checks I would run against any seller, this one included, using our API or the explorer. A reminder about the data: it comes from our own web data, refreshes roughly monthly and is not real-time. A link placed today may take weeks to appear.

1. Read the referring-domain list, not the backlink total. Call refdomains on the seller and sort by links. Here three of the top four rows are the seller's own sites, and the one outside name among them is a comment thread from 2013. Count the domains that are not the seller's own.
2. Check the stated authority against an independent number. The sister site says "DA 50+" in Moz's metric; we have not verified it and cannot, since it is another vendor's metric. Our DR is 28 and freeserp.ai shows 24. These are three different scales. The point is not that one is right but that a buyer should hold at least one number the seller did not supply. Our DR is comparable in spirit to other ratings, not the same as any of them.
3. Read the anchors. A profile where 92% of anchors are two button labels tells you the site's links are navigation, not editorial. Ask whether your anchor will sit in the body text of a page or in a footer.
4. After publication, look for the link. Use backlinks with the seller's domain as the source filter and your URL as the target. If your page does not appear after a couple of monthly refreshes, ask the seller to confirm that it is live and, where the page is sold as do-follow, which rel value it carries. Absence in our index is a prompt to ask, not proof of a problem: the crawl is a sample of the web.

We also run a sister service, IndexJump, for getting a new URL or backlink indexed. It does a different job from reading link data.

A letter like this is only useful if it says where the trail ran out. I could not find any of the following, so I have not claimed them: a price for any tier; a currency or payment method; how long a free article waits; how long any link stays live; whether paid links are marked sponsored; a legal entity, postal address or phone; independent traffic figures; any review or rating from a customer. The Terms page cites the law of the Netherlands, which reads like template text and is not evidence of where the business sits.

Before you pay, I would ask for these in one email and keep the reply: the price and currency; whether the link will carry nofollow, sponsored or neither; how many months it will stay; whether the post can be labelled as sponsored; and a link to two recent paid posts so you can check them yourself. If the answers are clear, go ahead. If they are vague, you have learned what you needed to know for the price of one email.

If you prefer to compare more sellers before choosing, our hub of link-building tools and sellers lists sibling pages, including the GuestPostSale alternative page, where the same checks apply.

Yours, with a calculator and no commission,
apibacklinks